Wednesday, April 20, 2016

Portfolio Analysis


Portfolio 1:

1. Name of photographer - Josh Birnbaum

2. General focus of portfolio (sports, stories, etc.)- Wheelchair basketball & people in wheelchairs

3. List three problems that the judges noted with the portfolio - The panning photo wasn't in focus, the photos caption weren't shot at the right time & the photos are cliche.

4. List two things the judges like-The photos were unique and there's good action in these photos.

5. What is your overall impression of the photographer? What did you like or not like?
The overall pictures weren't bad, but I felt that some of the photos were slightly cliche. I liked the action in the photos and the detail put into some of the photos.

Portfolio 2:

1. Name of photographer - Melissa Golden

2. General focus of portfolio (sports, stories, etc.)- The focus of the portfolio is old people.

3. List three problems that the judges noted with the portfolio - They have seen the picture story before, the subject/most important part of the photo was out of focus.

4. List two things the judges likeThe action photos she took were actually pretty ok.

5. What is your overall impression of the photographer? What did you like or not like?
I think the portraits she did were really good, but I really like her photo stories.

Portfolio 3:

1. Name of photographer - Sam Adams

2. General focus of portfolio (sports, stories, etc.)- The main focus of the portfolio was biking and silhouettes.

3. List three problems that the judges noted with the portfolio - They photos were a little out of focus. Some photos had an unclear subject. There was not enough action in his photos for sports photography.

4. List two things the judges likeThe lighting in the photos at the very beginning was very good and some photos filled the frame nicely.

5. What is your overall impression of the photographer? What did you like or not like?
I thought he was an okay photographer, but his photos were kind of boring.


Dustin Snipes

1. What did the judges note as strengths as they were critiquing it?
The perspective of the photos were really good. The photos he shot were very creative and he had great action shots.

2. What do you see as strengths? Do you see any weaknesses?
I liked his use of creative blurs, but some action shots didn't really need the creative blur on it.


Briefly describe the process the judges went through in deciding the winner.

1. Describe one photo that you agree with the judges on. Explain why you and the judges do or do not like it.
I agree with them on the car one in the action category because I think that the lighting and the blur is creative. They think the image is aesthetically pleasing and I do too. 

2. Describe one photo that you do NOT agree with the judges on. Explain why you think the judges are wrong.
The tennis one that they thought was beautiful, but the photographer didn't shoot the face in the photo. In my opinion, the photo would've been better with the face was in the photo.

No comments:

Post a Comment